COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 3380-03

Bill No.: HCS for HB 1304

Subject: Corporations; Courts; Judges; Liability; Health Care Professionals; Physicians

Type: Original

Date: February 23, 2004




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Highway Fund Unknown Unknown Unknown
Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

Unknown Unknown Unknown



Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 6 pages.











ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Local Government $0 $0

$0





FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Department of Mental Health, Department of Health and Senior Services, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, Department of Insurance, Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan, and the Department of Conservation assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.



In response to a previous version of the proposal, officials from the Office of Attorney General and the Office of Administration - Administrative Hearing Commission assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.



Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator assume the proposed legislation would create a new cause of action unlike any cause of action the courts have experience with. Therefore, at this time, CTS is unable to quantify any impact on the judiciary.



Oversight assumes the Office of State Courts Administrator could absorb the costs of the proposed legislation within existing resources.





ASSUMPTION (continued)



Officials from the Department of Transportation (MoDOT) assume the proposal incorporates the application of doctrine of joint and several liability in tort claims. The doctrine of joint and several liability contemplates that regardless of the percentage of fault assessed among all co-defendants, each one of these defendants is liable to pay the entire judgment if one or more of the remaining co-defendants cannot pay. This legislation limits the application of joint and several liability against a defendant in a tort action, which would include Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission (MHTC), only if the defendant is found to be fifty or more percent at fault. This provision could be advantageous to MHTC/MoDOT. However, an accurate estimate would be impossible to determine as the benefit of this revision would depend upon the number of cases impacted, the potential liability of MHTC in such cases, and other related factors.





FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2005

(10 Mo.)

FY 2006 FY 2007
HIGHWAY FUND
Savings - Department of Transportation
Liability limits Unknown Unknown Unknown
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON HIGHWAY FUND



Unknown


Unknown


Unknown




FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2005

(10 Mo.)

FY 2006 FY 2007
$0 $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.







DESCRIPTION



The proposed legislation would make changes to the laws affecting claims for damages and the payment thereof. In its main provisions, the proposal would:



(1) Establish venue in all tort actions in which the cause of action occurred in Missouri, including torts for improper health care, in the county where the cause of action occurred;



(2) Establish venue in all tort actions in which the cause of action occurred outside Missouri:



(a) For individual defendants, in the county of the individual's principal place of residence; and



(b) For corporate defendants, in the county where the corporate defendant's registered agent is located or, if no registered agent is reported or maintained, in Cole County;



(3) Establish venue in all actions in which a county is plaintiff in the county where the defendant resides, or in the county suing and where the defendant may be found;



(4) Require motions to dismiss or transfer based upon improper venue to be deemed granted if not denied within 60 days, unless the time period is waived in writing by all parties;



(5) Allow discovery of a defendant's assets in tort actions, including torts for improper health care, only after a court determines that the plaintiff has a submissible case on punitive damages;



(6) Provide that a defendant would be jointly and severally liable for the amount of compensatory and noneconomic damages only if the defendant is found to bear 50% or more of the fault, and a defendant would not be jointly and severally liable for more than the percentage of punitive damages for which fault is attributed to the defendant by the trier of fact;



(7) Add long-term care facilities licensed pursuant to Chapter 198 (Convalescent, Nursing, and Boarding Homes) to the definition of "health care provider" as used in Chapter 538 (Tort Actions Based on Improper Health Care);



(8) Increase the cap on noneconomic damages from $350,000 to $400,000, remove the "per occurrence" language in order to overrule a Missouri Supreme Court decision, and eliminate the requirement that award limitations for noneconomic damages be adjusted annually for inflation;





DESCRIPTION (continued)



(9) Limit civil damages recoverable against certain physicians, dentists, hospitals, and others to $400,000 for care or assistance necessitated by traumatic injury and rendered in a hospital emergency room;



(10) Make it mandatory rather than discretionary that a court dismiss any medical malpractice claim for which the plaintiff fails to file the required supporting expert affidavit and limit extensions of time to file the affidavit to an additional 90 days. The proposal would also require the expert to be licensed in substantially the same profession and specialty as the defendant and allow any defendant to request that the court review the expert opinion to determine whether the expert meets the required qualifications;



(11) Prohibit statements, writings, or benevolent gestures expressing sympathy from being admissible as evidence of an admission of liability in a civil action. Statements of fault would be admissible;



(12) Authorize the filing of a "miscellaneous" case for the purpose of securing copies of health care records and detail what the petition should and should not contain;



(13) Include a severability clause; and



(14) Clarify that the provisions of the bill would only apply to causes of action filed after August 28, 2004.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.







SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Office of the Attorney General

Office of Administration

- Administrative Hearing Commission

Office of State Courts Administrator

Department of Transportation

Department of Mental Health

Department of Health and Senior Services

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations

Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan

Department of Insurance

Department of Conservation





















Mickey Wilson, CPA

Director

February 23, 2004