COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 0661-05
Bill No.: SCS for HCS for HB 583
Subject: Courts; Law Enforcement Officers and Agencies
Type: Original
Date: May 4, 2007
Bill Summary: The proposal modifies the law relating to orders of protection.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on Other State Funds |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 4 pages.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on FTE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
☐ Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).
☐ Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
Local Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Department of Social Services, Department of Public Safety – Missouri State Highway Patrol, and the – Director’s Office assume the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.
Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator (CTS) assume the proposed legislation requires circuit clerks to provide notification information to individuals petitioning for ex parte orders of protection.
CTS states the meaning of the legislation is unclear in regard to the “information” to be provided to the petitioner. CTS assumes the “information” will be provided to the courts for distribution. If this is the case, there will be no cost to the courts. However, if the assumption is incorrect, there will be printing costs for the counties.
Officials from the Boone County Sheriff’s Department (BCSD) assume their notification to the clerk’s office on those respondents they cannot find would be in the form of “non-est” at the time the paper expires. BCSD assumes no fiscal impact.
Officials from the Clark County Sheriff’s Department, Greene County Sheriff’s Department, Jackson County Sheriff’s Department, St. Louis County Sheriff’s Department, Jackson County Circuit Clerk, Phelps County Circuit Clerk, and St. Louis City Circuit Clerk did not respond to Oversight’s request for fiscal impact.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government |
FY 2008 (10 Mo.) |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government |
FY 2008 (10 Mo.) |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of State Courts Administrator
Department of Social Services
Department of Public Safety
– Missouri State Highway Patrol
– Director’s Office
Boone County Sheriff’s Department
NOT RESPONDING
Clark County Sheriff’s Department
Greene County Sheriff’s Department
Jackson County Sheriff’s Department
St. Louis County Sheriff’s Department
Jackson County Circuit Clerk
Phelps County Circuit Clerk
St. Louis City Circuit Clerk
Mickey Wilson, CPA
Director
May 4, 2007