Bill Summary: Removes the expiration date to continue to restrict political subdivisions form providing certain telecommunications services and facilities. Modifies the state Do Not Call list and requires political phone calls to include a "paid for by" statement.

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND
FUND AFFECTED	FY 2008	FY 2009	FY 2010


Total Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund	$0	$0	$0

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED	FY 2008	FY 2009	FY 2010


Total Estimated Net Effect on Other State Funds	$0	$0	$0

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses. This fiscal note contains 5 pages.

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED	FY 2008	FY 2009	FY 2010


Total Estimated Net Effect on All Federal Funds	$0	$0	$0

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)
FUND AFFECTED	FY 2008	FY 2009	FY 2010


Total Estimated Net Effect on FTE	0	0	0

☐ Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).

☐ Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED	FY 2008	FY 2009	FY 2010
Local Government	$0	$0	$0

Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) assume many bills considered by the General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain amount of normal activity resulting from each year’s legislative session. The fiscal impact for this proposal for Administrative Rules is less than $2,500. The SOS recognizes this is a small amount and does not expect additional funding would be required to meet these costs. However, SOS also recognizes that many such bills may be passed in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what the SOS can sustain with their core budget. Any additional required funding would be handled through the budget process.

Officials from the Department of Economic Development - Public Service Commission and Office of Public Counsel state this proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective agencies.

Officials from Nodaway County stated there is no fiscal impact to their county since their county does not deal directly with telecommunications companies.

Officials from the City of Centralia state there is no fiscal impact to their city as a result of this proposal; no such service has been planned or discussed.

Officials from Kansas City state there would be no fiscal impact as a result of this proposal; however, the city would lose the opportunity in the future to provide telephone services to certain business tenants in city-owned facilities.

§407.1095, 407.1098, 407.1101, 407.1104, 407.1107, 407.1108, 1, 2 - NO CALL LIST

Officials from the Department of Corrections and the Department of Public Safety – Director’s Office assume the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.

Officials from the Office of the State Public Defender assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agency.

Officials from the Office of Attorney General assume that any potential costs arising from this proposal can be absorbed with existing resources.

Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on the courts.

Officials from the Office of Prosecution Services (OPS) assumed this proposal would not have a significant direct fiscal impact on county prosecutors or the Office of Prosecution Services.

Officials from the Missouri Ethics Commission state they can absorb the cost of the proposal within existing resources.

No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.

This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.