COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION


FISCAL NOTE


L.R. No.:         3157-01

Bill No.:          HB 1428

Subject:           Motor Vehicle Licenses; Motor Vehicles; Law Enforcement Officers and Agencies

Type:              Original

Date:               March 12, 2008





 

Bill Summary:            The proposal changes the mitigation of damages for failure to wear a safety belt from no more than 1% to no more than 50%.



FISCAL SUMMARY


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

General Revenue

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

More than $100,000


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

State Legal Expense

$0

$0

$0

Road

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

More than $100,000


Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 6 pages.




ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0

$0

$0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on

FTE

0

0

0


Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).


Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

Local Government

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

More than $100,000








FISCAL ANALYSIS


ASSUMPTION


Officials from the Office of Administration – Administrative Hearing Commission, Department of Health and Senior Services, Department of Public Safety – Missouri State Highway Patrol, and the – Director’s Office assume the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.


In response to a similar proposal from the 2007 Session (HB 82, LR # 0568-01), officials from the Office of the Attorney General assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agency.


Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on the courts.


In response to a similar proposal from the 2007 Session (HB 82, LR # 0568-01), officials from the Office of Administration – General Services Division (COA) assumed the proposed legislation has the potential for savings to the State Legal Expense. However, currently COA has no historical loss data on accidents involving the failure of plaintiffs to wear seatbelts.


The state self-assumes its own liability protection under the state legal expense fund, Section 105.711, RSMo. It is a self-funding mechanism whereby funds are made available for the payment of any claim or judgment rendered against the state in regard to the waivers of sovereign immunity or against employees and specified individuals. Investigation, defense, negotiation or settlement of such claims is provided by the Office of the Attorney General. Payment is made by the Commissioner of Administration with the approval of the Attorney General. The proposed legislation has the potential for savings to the state. COA has reflected the savings to the General Revenue Fund, as General Revenue funds the State Legal Expense Fund.


Oversight assumes the savings to the General Revenue fund has the potential of exceeding $100,000 per fiscal year.


Officials from the Department of Transportation (MoDOT) assume the proposal would likely account for some amount of fiscal savings; however, the amount is unknown. The proposal could have a positive affect on the self-insurance plan for both fleet vehicle liability and general liability claims cost.


ASSUMPTION (continued)


In response to a similar proposal from the 2007 Session (HB 82, LR # 0568-01), officials from MoDOT assumed the savings could exceed $100,000 per fiscal year. Therefore, Oversight assumes the savings to MoDOT could exceed $100,000 per fiscal year.


Officials from the Department of Conservation (MDC) assume the proposal would appear to have a minimal fiscal impact on MDC funds.


Oversight assumes cities and counties have the potential for a savings as a result of this proposal in the form of decreased insurance premiums due to decreased liability. Oversight assumes the statewide savings to cities and counties could exceed $100,000 per fiscal year.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government

FY 2009

(10 Mo.)

FY 2010

FY 2011

GENERAL REVENUE FUND

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SavingsOffice of Administration

 

 

 

     Reduced transfers out to State Legal Expense Fund


More than $100,000


More than $100,000


More than $100,000

 

 

 

 

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND


More than $100,000


More than $100,000


More than $100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STATE LEGAL EXPENSE FUND

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SavingsOffice of Administration

 

 

 

     Reduced liability

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

 

 

 

 

LossesOffice of Administration

 

 

 

     Decreased transfers in from General Revenue Fund


(More than $100,000)


(More than $100,000)


(More than $100,000)

 

 

 

 

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE LEGAL EXPENSE FUND


$0


$0


$0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ROAD FUND

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Savings – Department of Transportation

 

 

 

     Reduced liability

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

 

 

 

 

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON ROAD FUND


More than $100,000


More than $100,000


More than $100,000



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government

FY 2009

(10 Mo.)

FY 2010

FY 2011

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Savings – Cities and Counties

 

 

 

     Reduced insurance premiums

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

More than $100,000

 

 

 

 

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT


More than $100,000


More than $100,000


More than $100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business


No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.



FISCAL DESCRIPTION


Currently, a plaintiff’s damage award may be reduced by no more than 1% if the plaintiff was not wearing a seat belt. The proposed legislation changes the percentage to no more than 50%.


This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION


Office of the Attorney General

Office of Administration

            – General Services Division

            – Administrative Hearing Commission

Office of State Courts Administrator

Department of Transportation

Department of Health and Senior Services

Department of Public Safety

            – Director’s Office

            – Missouri State Highway Patrol

Department of Conservation








                                                                                                Mickey Wilson, CPA

                                                                                                Director

                                                                                                March 12, 2008