COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION


FISCAL NOTE


L.R. No.:         3698-01

Bill No.:          HB 1488

Subject:           Consumer Protection; Elderly; Crimes and Punishment; Secretary of State; Securities

Type:              Original

Date:               February 22, 2008





 

Bill Summary:            The proposed legislation changes the laws regarding criminal securities fraud and sets a minimum penalty when it is committed against the elderly or disabled.


FISCAL SUMMARY


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

General Revenue

(Less than $100,000)

(Less than $100,000)

(Less than $100,000)

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

(Less than $100,000)

(Less than $100,000)

(Less than $100,000)


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

$0

$0

$0


Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 5 pages.




ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0

$0

$0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on

FTE

0

0

0


Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).


Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

Local Government

$0

$0

$0








FISCAL ANALYSIS


ASSUMPTION


Officials from the Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions, and Professional Registration, Department of Mental Health, Department of Health and Senior Services, and the Office of the State Public Defender assume the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.


Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on the courts.


Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) assume they cannot currently predict the number of new commitments which may result from the creation of the offense(s) outlined in this proposal. An increase in commitments depends on the utilization by prosecutors and the actual sentences imposed by the court. 


If additional persons are sentenced to the custody of the DOC due to the provisions of this legislation, the DOC will incur a corresponding increase in operational cost either through incarceration (FY07 average of $41.21 per inmate per day, or an annual cost of $15,040 per inmate) or through supervision provided by the Board of Probation and Parole (FY07 average of $2.43 per offender per day, or an annual cost of $887 per offender).

 

At this time, the DOC is unable to determine the number of people who would be convicted under the provisions of this bill and therefore the number of additional inmate beds that may be required as a consequence of passage of this proposal. Estimated construction cost for one new medium to maximum-security inmate bed is $55,000. Utilizing this per-bed cost provides for a conservative estimate by the DOC, as facility start-up costs are not included and entire facilities and/or housing units would have to be constructed to cover the cost of housing new commitments resulting from the cumulative effect of various new legislation, if adopted as statute.


In summary, supervision by the DOC through probation or incarceration would result in additional unknown costs to the department. Seven (7) persons would have to be incarcerated per fiscal year to exceed $100,000 annually. Due to the narrow scope of this new crime, it is assumed the impact would be less than $100,000 per year for the DOC.




ASSUMPTION (continued)


Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) assume many bills considered by the General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain amount of normal activity resulting from each year’s legislative session. The fiscal impact for this proposal for Administrative Rules is less than $2,500. The SOS recognizes this is a small amount and does not expect additional funding would be required to meet these costs. However, SOS also recognizes that many such bills may be passed in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what the SOS can sustain with their core budget. Any additional required funding would be handled through the budget process.


Officials from the Office of the Attorney General and the Office of Prosecution Services did not respond to Oversight’s request for fiscal impact.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government

FY 2009

(10 Mo.)

FY 2010

FY 2011

GENERAL REVENUE FUND

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs – Department of Corrections

 

 

 

     Incarceration/probation costs

(Less than $100,000)

(Less than $100,000)

(Less than $100,000)

 

 

 

 

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT NO GENERAL REVENUE FUND


(Less than $100,000)


(Less than $100,000)


(Less than $100,000)



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government

FY 2009

(10 Mo.)

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

$0

$0

$0



FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business


No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.



FISCAL DESCRIPTION


The proposed legislation changes the laws regarding criminal securities fraud as it relates to the elderly and disabled:


The proposal adds the minimum penalties of a fine of not less than $50,000 and imprisonment for not less than five years for persons convicted of criminal securities fraud against a person 60 years of age or older or a disabled person. The proposal also allows the Commissioner of Securities within the Office of the Secretary of State to impose additional civil penalties and order restitution.


This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION


Office of State Courts Administrator

Department of Mental Health

Department of Health and Senior Services

Department of Corrections

Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions, and Professional Registration

Office of the Secretary of State

Office of the State Public Defender



NOT RESPONDING


Office of the Attorney General

Office of Prosecution Services








                                                                                                Mickey Wilson, CPA

                                                                                                Director

                                                                                                February 22, 2008