COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 4019-01
Bill No.: HB 2117
Subject: St. Louis City: Law Enforcement
Type: Original
Date: February 22, 2008
Bill Summary: Allows the City of St. Louis to control its police force without state intervention by passing an ordinance.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on Other State Funds |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 4 pages.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on FTE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
☐ Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).
☐ Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
Local Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Office of State Courts Administrator assume no fiscal impact on the Courts.
Officials of the Department of Public Safety assume no fiscal impact to their department.
Officials of the St. Louis Police Retirement System assume no fiscal impact.
In response to identical legislation of last session, fiscal note 1735-01, SB 486, the following fiscal impact statements were issued:
Officials of the Office of the Secretary of State assume no fiscal impact to their office.
Officials of the Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement stated that this proposal would not create a “substantial proposed change” in future plan benefits as defined in Section 105.660(5). Therefore, an actuarial cost statement is not required.
Officials of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department assume this proposal as written is permissive, and would require action by the city’s governing body before there would be either a positive or negative fiscal impact.
Officials of the City of St. Louis-Budget Division assume the City would realize some additional administrative costs due to oversight and liability, and would save costs associated with Board of Police Commissioners expenses and costs previously spent on legislative communications regarding police matters. Officials assume there would be potential savings in administrative and support functions inherent with the combination of two large organizations such as the City and the Police Department.
Oversight assumes this proposal is discretionary and would require action by the local governing body. Oversight assumes this proposal as written would have no fiscal impact.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government |
FY 2009 (10 Mo.) |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government |
FY 2009 (10 Mo.) |
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of the Secretary of State
Office of State Courts Administrator
Department of Public Safety
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department - Budget and Finance
St. Louis Police Retirement System
City of St. Louis -Budget Division
Mickey Wilson, CPA
Director
February 22, 2008