COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION


FISCAL NOTE

 

L.R. No.:         4531-01

Bill No.:          Perfected SB 1002

Subject:           Planning and Zoning: Crimes and Punishment

Type:              Original 

Date:               February 28, 2008




 

Bill Summary:            Modifies the penalties for certain zoning violations.



FISCAL SUMMARY


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

$0

$0

$0


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

$0

$0

$0


Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 5 pages.




ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0

$0

$0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on

FTE

0

0

0


Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).


Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

Local Government

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown








FISCAL ANALYSIS


ASSUMPTION


Officials of the Office of State Courts Administrator’s office assume no fiscal impact to the Courts.


Officials of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education assume this proposal would have no fiscal impact to local schools districts.


Oversight will show a positive unknown increase in revenue to certain local governments from the increase in fines for zoning violations.


Oversight assumes no state fiscal impact.


FISCAL IMPACT - State Government

FY 2009

(10 Mo.)

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

$0

$0

$0

 

 

 

 


FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government

FY 2009

(10 Mo.)

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS - CITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income- To certain political Subdivisions

 

 

 

from increases in fines for zoning violations.

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

 

 

 

 

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

 

 

 

 


FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business


No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.



FISCAL DESCRIPTION


Currently, property owners violating certain zoning regulations in municipalities located in Jackson County shall be fined at least $10 but not more $500, or imprisoned for ten days, for each day of such violation. For second or subsequent offenses involving the same violation at the same place, the punishment shall be a fine of not less than $250 but not more than $1,000, or imprisonment for ten days, for each day of the violation. In all other municipalities, property owners shall be fined at least $10 but not more than $100 for each day of the violation, unless the offense was committed wilfully, in which case, the penalty shall be a fine of not less than $100 but not more than $250, or imprisonment for ten days, for each day of such violation.


Under this act, a property owner in any city with more than 300,000 inhabitants may be fined at least $10 but not more $500, or imprisoned for ten days, for each day of such violation. For second or subsequent offenses involving the same violation at the same place, the punishment shall be a fine of not less than $250 but not more than $1,000, or imprisonment for ten days, for each day of the violation.


In all other municipalities, property owners shall be fined not less than $10 but not more than $250, or imprisoned for ten days, for each day of the violation. For second or subsequent offenses involving the same violation at the same place, the punishment shall be a fine of not less than $100 but not more than $500, or imprisonment for ten days, for each day of the violation.


This act repeals the other version of Section 89.120, RSMo, which was doubly-enacted.


This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.


SOURCES OF INFORMATION


Office of State Courts Administrator

Department of Elementary and Secondary Education


NOT RESPONDING


City of Bridgeton

City of Cape Girardeau

City of Clayton





NOT RESPONDING (continued)


City of Columbia

City of Florissant

City of Gladstone

City of Independence

City of Jefferson City

City of Kansas City

City of Maryland Heights

City of Lees Summit

City of Raytown

City of Springfield

City of St. Charles

City of St. Louis

City of St. Joseph










                                                                                                Mickey Wilson, CPA

                                                                                                Director

                                                                                                February 28, 2008