COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION


FISCAL NOTE


L.R. No.:         5173-01

Bill No.:          Perfected HB 2266

Subject:           Teachers; Education, Higher; Education, Elementary and Secondary

Type:              Original

Date:               April 22, 2008





 

Bill Summary:            This proposal revises the Missouri Teaching Fellows Program.



FISCAL SUMMARY


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

$0

$0

$0


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

$0

$0

$0


Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 5 pages.




ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0

$0

$0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated

Net Effect on

FTE

0

0

0


Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).


Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).


ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

Local Government

$0

$0

$0








FISCAL ANALYSIS


ASSUMPTION


Officials at the Office of the State Treasurer and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education assume that there is no fiscal impact from this proposal.


Officials at the Department of Higher Education (DHE) assume the following:


Currently, the statute specifies that award amounts will be adjusted for inflation. The DHE assumes that inflation for FY 09 through FY 11 will be the same as it was for FY 08 (4.3%). The DHE concludes, therefore, that the award amount for students in their first through fourth years of teaching was $5,000 for FY 09 and will be $5,215 for FY 10 and $5,439 for FY 11. The award amount for students in their fifth year of teaching was $1,000 for FY 09 and will be $1,043 for FY 10 and $1,088 for FY 11.


Currently, the statute specifies that no more than $1 million may be appropriated to fund the program per year, and that amount shall be adjusted for inflation annually. The DHE assumes that inflation for FY 09 through FY 11 will be the same as it was for FY 08 (4.3%). The DHE concludes, therefore, that the maximum appropriation for FY 09 was $1,000,000 and will be $1,043,000 for FY 10 and $1,087,849 for FY 11.


The DHE assumes that it would need to hire one FTE Program Specialist to administer the program, including reviewing institutional eligibility requirements and working with participating institutions in order to distribute funds accurately and smoothly. The Program Specialist would start at $35,000 per year plus associated expenses in FY 09.


The DHE assumes that the maximum number of participants will receive awards through the program. Because the DHE cannot exceed the statutory maximum annual appropriation mentioned above, the DHE assumes that there will be 47 participants in FY 09, 94 participants in FY 10, and 141 participants in FY 11.


Oversight assumes that this proposal is only tightening the requirements of an eligible applicant and is not creating a new program. Therefore the Department of Higher Education can use its existing staff to continue to monitor this program.


Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) state many bills considered by the General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain amount of normal activity resulting from each year’s legislative session. The fiscal impact for


ASSUMPTION (continued)


this fiscal note to the SOS for Administrative Rules is less than $2,500. The SOS recognizes that this is a small amount and does not expect that additional funding would be required to meet these costs. However, the SOS also recognizes that many such bills may be passed by the General Assembly in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what the office can sustain with the core budget. Therefore, the SOS reserves the right to request funding for the cost of supporting administrative rules requirements should the need arise based on a review of the finally approved bills signed by the governor.


Oversight assumes the SOS could absorb the costs of printing and distributing regulations related to this proposal. If multiple bills pass which require the printing and distribution of regulations at substantial costs, the SOS could request funding through the appropriation process.


FISCAL IMPACT - State Government

FY 2009

(10 Mo.)

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0

$0

$0



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government

FY 2009

(10 Mo.)

FY 2010

FY 2011

 

 

 

 

 

$0

$0

$0


FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business


No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.



FISCAL DESCRIPTION


The proposed legislation appears to have no fiscal impact.


This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.




SOURCES OF INFORMATION


Office of the State Treasurer

Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Department of Higher Education

Office of the Secretary of State






                                                                                                Mickey Wilson, CPA

                                                                                                Director

                                                                                                April 22, 2008