COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 5483-02
Bill No.: Perfected HCS #2 for HB 1462
Subject: Agriculture and Animals; Energy; Agriculture Dept.
Type: Original
Date: March 27, 2012
Bill Summary: This proposal extends the amount of time that a biodiesel producer is eligible to collect from the Missouri Qualified Biodiesel Producer Incentive Fund.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2013 |
FY 2014 |
FY 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2013 |
FY 2014 |
FY 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on Other State Funds |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 4 pages.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2013 |
FY 2014 |
FY 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2013 |
FY 2014 |
FY 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Net Effect on FTE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
☐ Estimated Total Net Effect on All funds expected to exceed $100,000 savings or (cost).
☐ Estimated Net Effect on General Revenue Fund expected to exceed $100,000 (cost).
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS |
|||
FUND AFFECTED |
FY 2013 |
FY 2014 |
FY 2015 |
Local Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials at the Department of Agriculture and Joint Committee on Administrative Rules each assume there is no fiscal impact from this proposed legislation.
In response to the previous version of this proposal, Officials at the Department of Revenue stated there is no fiscal impact from this proposed legislation.
Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) stated many bills considered by the General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain amount of normal activity resulting from each year’s legislative session. The fiscal impact for this fiscal note to the SOS for Administrative Rules is less than $2,500. The SOS recognizes that this is a small amount and does not expect that additional funding would be required to meet these costs. However, the SOS also recognizes that many such bills may be passed by the General Assembly in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what the office can sustain with the core budget. Therefore, the SOS reserves the right to request funding for the cost of supporting administrative rules requirements should the need arise based on a review of the finally approved bills signed by the governor.
Oversight assumes the SOS could absorb the costs of printing and distributing regulations related to this proposal. If multiple bills pass which require the printing and distribution of regulations at substantial costs, the SOS could request funding through the appropriation process.
Oversight assumes there is no fiscal impact from this proposed legislation on state or local
government funds.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government |
FY 2013 (10 Mo.) |
FY 2014 |
FY 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government |
FY 2013 (10 Mo.) |
FY 2014 |
FY 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Agriculture
Office of Secretary of State
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
Department of Revenue
Mickey Wilson, CPA
Director
March 27, 2012